Environmental use restriction type
The recorded activity, land-use, groundwater-use, or other restriction imposed because of environmental contamination or remediation.
Sources that carry it
17 sourcesADEQ's statewide ArcGIS layer of recorded Declaration of Environmental Use Restriction and Voluntary Environmental Mitigation Use Restriction sites, including institutional or engineering controls and site locations.
Statewide NC DEQ Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch inventory of sites tracked under the state hazardous-waste cleanup program that are not on the federal National Priorities List, published through an ArcGIS FeatureServer.
Florida Institutional Controls Registry (ICR) — contaminated sites subject to institutional controls (recorded deed restrictions/covenants/use restrictions) under Ch. 62-780 F.A.C. FDEP DWM ICR polygon layer 12; 2,628 sites with site name, address, and control-boundary centroid coordinates. INST_CONTROL is the registry's primary attribute (every ICR site has an institutional control). Single-attribute source. NOTE: same ICR layer 12 as fl_dep__institutional_controls_registry (#266/ENG_CONTROLS) — kept separate per attribute by dev decision.
Florida Institutional Controls Registry (ICR) — FDEP Division of Waste Management registry of contaminated sites with institutional and/or engineering controls (Ch. 62-780 F.A.C.). Polygon layer 12 on the FDEP Geospatial Open Data MapServer; 2,628 sites with site name, address, and control-boundary centroid coordinates. Serves ENG_CONTROLS: FDEP publishes no standalone engineering-controls dataset, and in FL an engineering control requires a recorded institutional control, so EC sites are a subset of the ICR (the EC subset is not separately flagged in the public data — full ICR shipped).
Authoritative analog for re-evaluation sites: confirmed-contaminated cases absent from KCSL whose case status is not closed.
All leaking underground storage tank incidents published by DC DOEE through the DC GIS feature layer, from historical records through the present. Each row represents a distinct case number and includes open, closed, no-further-action, administrative-closure, and related statuses; the live endpoint returned 1,952 records on 2026-07-13.
Land Restoration Program closure determinations, including engineering and institutional controls.
Brownfield-flagged sites from MDE’s Land Restoration Program sites layer.
South Carolina SARR cleanup sites with recorded restrictive covenants or other activity and use limitations, published from the SARR Public Records ArcGIS layer.
South Carolina state-program hazardous-site cleanup inventory covering State Voluntary Cleanup and State Remediation tracks, deduplicated to site grain.
Illinois EPA registry of Site Remediation Program No Further Remediation letters, aggregated to one row per site and joined to site location data, with engineered-barrier and institutional-control indicators.
Statewide extract of engineering and institutional controls recorded across TCEQ remediation programs, assembled from Public Information Request 26-117411. The extract contains 871 control records at 583 sites and must be refreshed through a new public-information request.
Show 5 more sources+−
Georgia properties subject to recorded environmental covenants under the Uniform Environmental Covenants Act.
Statewide Vermont brownfields point layer with site identity, location, contamination, restrictions, and program status.
Statewide Vermont hazardous-sites inventory covering active and historical sites with site identity, address, priority, status, contamination source, contaminants, record links, and coordinates.
Filtered view of Vermont hazardous sites where a land-use restriction is recorded, exposing site identity, location, status, contamination context, closure information, and document links.
ADEQ's statewide ArcGIS inventory of sites participating in the Voluntary Remediation Program, with status, location, contaminants of concern, and affected media.
Questions it helps answer
Need Environmental use restriction type at scale?
We compare every source that carries it on your own records — fill rate, freshness, definition — and bring the winner into production for you.