Parcel storage-tank release remediation status
What investigation, corrective action, remediation, monitoring, closure, or no-further-action status is officially reported for a storage-tank release at or near this parcel, and as of what date?
The data that answers it
Ranked by fit · best firstThe BRRTS LUST bulk subset publishes raw activity status and status code with start and end dates, risk code, and cleanup-fund identifiers for open and closed LUST activities.
The DC LUST layer publishes each case's raw STATUS together with cleanup-initiated, closed, monitoring-started, event, notification, and entry dates, long-term-monitoring and VRAP fields.
Each Florida PCTS discharge row includes general and discharge cleanup status, discharge-cleanup-status effective date, report phase and subphase, and report-subphase date, providing row-level cleanup lifecycle evidence for the identified discharge.
The Region 1 Indian Country LUST workbook supplies LUST ReleaseStatus, LastRelease Status, LastRelease StatusDate, Last Event, and Last Event Date for recorded releases.
At the addressed release-notice grain, Arkansas TankStats publishes current coded release status, cleanup-initiation date, no-further-action issued date, emergency-response indicator, and release/cleanup comments.
The release-focused TDEC subset publishes Currentstatus for each address-keyed release or investigation case together with discovery date, case description, cause, released product, and responsible-party context.
ADEQ's UST Releases layer supplies case-level raw STATUS and closure date alongside discovered, reported, and confirmed dates and priority, allowing the reported release-case lifecycle to be pinned to the nightly layer vintage.
For Georgia UST projects with a populated confirmed-release date, the workbook publishes cleanup status and no-further-action date together with facility, project, programme category, and confirmed-release date.
The Delaware layer supplies the published corrective-action project status for each identified LUST/site/project record through a standing query/export endpoint. Its harvested schema has no milestone or status-effective date.
The Illinois incident layer exposes resolution-related date fields, including NFR_NFA, SEC_57_5G, NONLUST, and pre_74_Date, together with project-manager and consultant fields. This is strong evidence of reported case milestones where populated, but the published field labels and dates must be preserved and current cleanup phase must not be inferred from roster presence alone.
EPA's public Releases layer publishes a raw Status whose live documented values are Open, No Further Action, and Unknown, plus NFA-letter fields and a Tribal-only closed-with-residual-contamination field. EPA documents the layer's snapshot vintages, so the reported status can be pinned to the applicable jurisdiction-level source vintage and retrieval date. This is strong raw remediation-standing evidence, but it does not supply a general per-case status-effective date, corrective-action phase, monitoring chronology, or dated milestone history.
For the addressed Maryland LUST cases in this pre-1999 slice, EPA publishes raw Status and Open and Closed indicators at Facility_ID/LUST_ID grain together with Reported_Date and Substance. This supplies Strong regulator-reported release-case standing after explicit address/coordinate-to-parcel resolution. Pin the answer to the frozen pre-1999 selection, EPA's September 2018–December 2019 snapshot, and retrieval date; no status-effective date, investigation chronology, remedy effectiveness, present site condition, or organisation attribution is supplied.
Related questions
Under Parcel environmental contamination and remediation statusNeed Parcel storage-tank release remediation status answered at scale?
We will test these sources on your own records, show you match and fill rates, then handle the contract, security review, and delivery into your stack.