Industry claim severity benchmarks
What average claim severity does comparable industry experience show for this coverage, class, and area?
The data that answers it
Ranked by fit · best firstASDI’s current scheduled circulars directly provide statewide, regional, and multistate average paid or incurred claim-cost and severity results by supported line, coverage, geography, experience period, and, for applicable analyses, valuation date. Use only the basis stated in the licensed circular; public evidence does not establish a universal currency/scale, claim definition, gross/net treatment, or method version.
The 2026 CompScope family compares 18 workers-compensation state systems using total cost per claim and medical and indemnity components, with injury-year cohorts, experience through 2025, multiple claim maturities, report edition, publication date, and state-report identifiers. Public evidence does not define paid/incurred/ultimate, currency/inflation, gross/net, component inclusion, or case-mix basis, which must be retained from the purchased report.
ISO DataCube reports paid/incurred losses, claim or occurrence counts, and severity for selectable U.S. line, coverage/subline, class, state, experience period, and loss-type cohorts, with applicable development or anticipated-ultimate, valuation, LAE, limits, and salvage/subrogation treatment. Retain annual release/as-of and line-specific basis; no universal currency-code, immutable revision, or gross/net field is documented.
State of the Line publishes ultimate medical, indemnity, and combined medical-plus-indemnity loss per ultimate lost-time claim, plus first-report medical paid-plus-case severity, with accident year, NCCI-state geography, industry/class/carrier cohorts, valuation and development basis, large-deductible exclusion, displayed dollar scale, and report edition.
FEMA identifies the public product as a dataset of NFIP flood-insurance claim transactions. Live rows expose cumulative paid building, contents, and increased-cost-of-compliance claim amounts together with loss year and date, geography, occupancy and building-description codes, building-versus-contents coverage amounts, most recent payment date, and dataset as-of date. These fields support calculation of observed average paid severity for explicitly selected NFIP flood cohorts by geography, coverage component, and available property-class dimensions. The result is an external NFIP programme benchmark, not an all-carrier, ultimate, prospective, gross or net, or development-adjusted industry benchmark.
Related questions
Under Industry loss experienceNeed Industry claim severity benchmarks answered at scale?
We will test these sources on your own records, show you match and fill rates, then handle the contract, security review, and delivery into your stack.